Translate this page into:
International organization for standardization 15189 in medical laboratory practice: A review of standards and implementation
*Corresponding author: Vikash Chandra Mishra, Department of Molecular Genetics and Transplant Immunology, Chimera Transplant Research Foundation, New Delhi, India. vikashbiotech01@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Mishra VC, Chandra D, Raina V. International organization for standardization 15189 in medical laboratory practice: A review of standards and implementation. Indian J Med Sci. 2026;78:187-91. doi: 10.25259/IJMS_28_2025
Abstract
To promote accuracy, reliability, and patient safety in laboratory diagnostics, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15189 has been established as an important standard for medical laboratories worldwide, ensuring that they meet stringent laboratory quality requirements. Despite this, its implementation is not an easy task and presents challenges such as the resource-intensive nature of ISO15189 adoption, training gaps, and resistance to change in many regions, particularly in low-resource settings, when incorporating a unified approach to laboratory quality management system (QMS). The risk-based thinking, patient-centered care, and standard flexibility have allowed laboratories to adopt new technologies such as automation and digital platforms to enhance accuracy, efficiency, and patient care. Furthermore, integration with regulatory frameworks has facilitated harmonization across different countries, resulting in a more consistent approach to laboratory quality systems. The future of ISO 15189 is characterized by an increasing focus on collaborative efforts, the digital revolution of laboratories, sustainability, and proactive risk management. This is an attempt to analyze the current scenario of QMS in the context of ISO 15189, focusing on its implementation, challenges, and future directions to make ISO 15189 more accessible to laboratories globally.
Keywords
ISO15189
ISO15189:2022
Medical laboratories
National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories
Quality
INTRODUCTION
ISO 15189, titled “Medical laboratories - Requirements for quality and competence,” which provides a structure for establishing and maintaining a laboratory quality management system (QMS), is an internationally recognized standard specifically developed for medical laboratories.[1] The first version of ISO 15189 was introduced in 2003 by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), specifically tailored to the medical diagnostics laboratory requirement, to ensure both the technical competence and the accuracy of test results.[2] The first version of the ISO 15189 was derived from ISO/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 17025 and ISO 9001, which comprises all aspects of laboratory activities, including pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical testing, ensuring that laboratories consistently deliver high-quality, accurate, and reliable results.[1,2] Its formation was driven by the fact that general quality standards (such as ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 17025) did not fully cater to the specific medical diagnostic quality requirements of the laboratories. ISO 15189 bridged this gap by combining elements of quality management with technical competence specific to medical diagnostic laboratories.[3] The fundamental goal of ISO15189 is to provide assurance that medical diagnostic laboratories produce reliable, accurate, and clinically relevant results while maintaining compliance with QMS and patient safety. Further, to incorporate advancements in medical diagnostics, changes in healthcare delivery systems, and the growing importance of risk management and patient-centered care, ISO 15189 has been revised over time.[2,4] The major developments in the formation and amendment of ISO15189, as shown in Table 1, have captured the progression of medical laboratory operations by integrating insights from worldwide diagnostic procedures as well as from technological advancements. The current active version of ISO15189 (2022 revision) represents a significant transformation toward more patient-centered, modern, and future-ready diagnostic procedures in medical laboratories. ISO 15189 has been firmly established as the global gold standard for medical laboratory accreditation, ensuring its continued applicability and efficacy despite rapid advancements in healthcare delivery and medical diagnostics through these amendments.[5]
| 1st Edition (2003) | 2nd Edition (2007) | 3rd Edition (2012) | 4th Edition (2022) |
|---|---|---|---|
| The inaugural version of ISO 15189 was based on ISO/IEC 17025, with modifications to reflect the operational and ethical complexities of medical laboratories. | Introduced refinements to align the standard more closely with ISO 9001, emphasizing the integration of quality management principles. | Major updates were made to strengthen the focus on laboratory management and patient-centered practices. | The current version reflects the rapid advancements in medical diagnostics, technological integration, and evolving healthcare demands. |
| Focus areas included the competence of personnel, traceability of measurements, and quality assurance of test results. | Provided clearer guidance on documentation requirements and improved alignment with the clinical needs of healthcare providers. | Introduced enhanced guidelines for risk management, emphasizing the identification and mitigation of potential errors across pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases. Greater emphasis was placed on the competence and ongoing training of laboratory personnel. | Key highlights include: Risk-Based Thinking, Patient Safety, Digital Transformation, Sustainability and Environmental Responsibility, Simplification and Clarity, and Improved structure and clearer language to facilitate implementation and understanding across diverse laboratory settings. |
ISO: International Organization for Standardization, IEC: International Electrotechnical Commission
The accuracy and reliability of diagnostic test results are vital to patient care, which form the foundation of effective diagnosis, treatment, and disease management. ISO 15189 plays an important role in providing assurance among healthcare providers, patients, and regulatory authorities by highlighting stringent quality control measures, risk assessment, and continual improvement. Furthermore, by defining practices that reduce errors, improve accurate reporting, and ease communication between laboratories and clinicians, it also harmonizes laboratory operations with patient safety objectives.[1,6] ISO 15189 is a standard for laboratories aiming to fulfill the increasing expectations for accuracy, timeliness, and accountability as the field of medical diagnostics continues to change with technology improvements.
The objective of this review is to analyze the current status of QMS in relation to ISO 15189, with an emphasis on implementation, challenges, and potential future developments. This paper aims to give an extensive overview of how ISO 15189 influences medical laboratory operations by looking at worldwide trends and the effects of recent changes. In addition, it will address the challenges faced by laboratories in resource-constrained environments and emerging trends, including the integration of cutting-edge technologies and sustainable practices. In addition, this evaluation seeks to provide useful information for laboratories, legislators, and accrediting organizations working to improve patient safety and diagnostic quality.
IMPACT OF REVISIONS ON THE STANDARD’S EVOLUTION
Global adoption and implementation
The adoption of ISO 15189 is growing substantially worldwide, reflecting its importance and global recognition for enhancing patient care and diagnostic quality.[7] Hence, the standard has been widely adopted in many developed countries and is sometimes integrated with other national accreditation systems (such as the College of American Pathologists, Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments [CLIA], and the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service). The aim of raising laboratory quality and conforming to international standards has driven the growing acceptance of ISO 15189 in developing countries. In nations, the adoption of ISO 15189 is increasing, often driven by the desire to improve laboratory quality and align with international standards.[1] The implementation of ISO 15189 in India is largely attributed to the National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories, and the number of accredited medical laboratories has been continuously increasing.[8] The ISO 15189:2022 revision has further supported global adoption by introducing a more flexible, outcome-based, and risk-oriented framework, allowing laboratories with varying resource capacities to implement the standard more effectively compared to the more prescriptive ISO 15189:2012 version.[5]
Accreditation trends and integration with regulatory frameworks
The number of accredited medical laboratories is steadily rising worldwide. As of 2024, more than 114,600 laboratories globally have received accreditation under various standards, according to the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation.[9] The number of accredited laboratories is growing annually, reflecting the standardized quality and expertise in medical laboratories, especially in Asia and Africa, where healthcare infrastructure is expanding.[10] The World Health Organization (WHO) and the ILAC are key players in encouraging the global adoption of ISO 15189.
As a global network of accrediting organizations, ILAC ensures cross-border harmonization of quality standards, enabling laboratories to conform to internationally accepted standards.[11] Furthermore, WHO also promotes the expansion of accredited laboratories in regions with limited resources and supports the accreditation of ISO 15189 in order to improve healthcare services.[12]
The integration of ISO 15189 has been crucial to ensuring uniformity and enhancing laboratory quality across various systems under national and regional regulatory frameworks. CLIA provides basic requirements for laboratory operations in the United States. ISO 15189 provides a more comprehensive QMS framework, whereas CLIA primarily focuses on laboratory procedures and personnel regulations. To meet quality and regulatory requirements, many laboratories, particularly those in complex sectors, combine ISO 15189 accreditation with CLIA certification.[2] In a comparable way, the NABL in India has closely integrated ISO 15189 with its accreditation program in order to ensure that medical laboratories fulfill international standards while adhering to Indian laws and regulations.[8] In India’s expanding healthcare industry, this harmonization promotes uniformity in procedures and improves the accuracy of diagnostic findings. Despite advancements, there are still issues with integrating ISO 15189 with regional regulatory frameworks. The standards and regulations of various nations may occasionally conflict with or overlap with ISO 15189.[13] For instance, laboratories in certain nations might have to adhere to local regulations that don’t fully align with ISO 15189, creating difficulties in meeting both local and international standards. The 2022 revision addresses this issue by offering greater implementation flexibility, allowing laboratories to demonstrate conformity based on outcomes rather than solely on prescriptive documentation.[5]
Technological advancements
Technological advancements are enhancing the implementation of ISO 15189, resulting in more robust laboratory functionality. Routine procedures such as quality control, result reporting, and sample analysis are becoming more and more automated in laboratories, which ensures more dependable results by increasing accuracy and decreasing human error.[1,14] In addition, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has also started to monitor laboratory processes and predict potential errors, which ultimately enhances decision-making and helps laboratories comply with ISO 15189’s rigorous quality control requirements. Modern laboratory operations now depend heavily on laboratory information management systems (LIMSs), which enable laboratories to track samples from collection to reporting, ensuring that each step of the diagnostic process is traceable and documented.[15] This enhances operational effectiveness, reduces error rates, and promotes adherence to ISO 15189 standards, particularly regarding documentation and traceability requirements. Furthermore, as technology has advanced, leading medical laboratories worldwide have effectively utilized LIMS to improve their compliance with ISO 15189.[1] The 2022 revision places increased emphasis on information management, data security, and integrity, reflecting the growing digitalization of laboratory services.
Patient-centered strategies
In line with ISO 15189’s emphasis on patient safety, effective communication of laboratory results is vital to patient care. A major enhancement in ISO 15189:2022 is its explicit focus on patient-centered care, including consideration of patient needs, ethical practices, and communication strategies. Laboratories are encouraged to ensure that results are not only analytically correct but also clinically meaningful and accessible. Some laboratories have implemented patient-friendly reporting formats and digital platforms to improve transparency and patient engagement.[7]
Risk-based approaches
ISO 15189 encourages laboratories to have a system in place to identify and manage risks. To identify potential risks to laboratory operations (such as human error, equipment failure, and sample contamination), laboratories employ techniques including failure mode and effects analysis and root cause analysis.[1] To minimize risks, several mitigation strategies may be employed, such as regular equipment calibration, retraining personnel, or implementing redundant systems. Further, by implementing a risk-based approach in alignment with ISO15189, laboratories can proactively identify potential issues and mitigate them before they affect patient care.[16] Unlike the more prescriptive approach of ISO 15189:2012, the 2022 revision allows laboratories to design risk management processes tailored to their specific context. All these implementations and processes within the laboratory operations foster a culture of continuous improvement, which aligns with the basic principle of ISO 15189, thereby improving the quality, accuracy, and reliability of test results and ultimately leading to better patient satisfaction. Unlike the more prescriptive approach of ISO 15189:2012, the 2022 revision allows laboratories to design risk management processes tailored to their specific context.
Challenges and limitations
Even though ISO 15189 offers medical laboratories numerous advantages, there are certain challenges in implementing this standard. Resource constraints, resistance to change, evolving standards, and regional variations are all issues laboratories must address. While ISO 15189:2022 introduces flexibility and outcome-based compliance, laboratories still require substantial investment in infrastructure, training, and leadership commitment. However, overcoming these obstacles offers laboratories an opportunity to enhance patient safety, improve overall quality, and support international efforts to improve healthcare outcomes. Laboratories can advance toward fulfilling ISO 15189 compliance and improve diagnostic services globally by recognizing these obstacles and creating plans to overcome them.[13]
Opportunities and future directions
ISO 15189 may remain a pillar of quality assurance in medical laboratories worldwide by embracing digital transformation, increasing access in low-resource settings, encouraging international cooperation, and incorporating sustainability and proactive risk management. The continuous progression of the standard and its patient-centric approach, along with its global adoption, will ensure that medical laboratories contribute to safer, more accurate, and timely patient diagnoses across all regions, regardless of resource availability. In addition to improving patient outcomes, laboratories that remain ahead of these developments will continue to have a competitive advantage in the rapidly evolving healthcare system. The 2022 revision encourages laboratories to adopt environmentally responsible practices and proactive risk management strategies.
Although ISO 15189 has been shown to be an effective tool for enhancing laboratory standards, there are still issues with its global implementation, especially in developing regions. To facilitate the implementation of ISO 15189, laboratories require funding, infrastructure development, and training. Furthermore, the standard must be continually reevaluated to maintain its relevance and effectiveness in enhancing patient care, given regional variations in accrediting procedures and developments in the healthcare system. Technological advancements such as AI, machine learning, and automation, which reduce human error and improve diagnosis, give laboratories the chance to meet ISO 15189 standards. Medical laboratories’ environmental effect can be further decreased by incorporating sustainable procedures and processing in accordance with ISO 15189. ISO 15189 will remain a vital standard for medical laboratory quality as healthcare demands around the world change. Healthcare leaders, laboratory managers, accreditation bodies, and policymakers must invest in the creation and ongoing development of ISO 15189-compliant laboratories to ensure their effectiveness and success. They can address the growing need for high-quality diagnostics and enhance patient outcomes globally by cultivating a culture of quality assurance and cooperation.
CONCLUSION
This review highlights that ISO 15189 is not just a standard but a transformative tool for improving healthcare through higher-quality diagnostic testing. Although the process of broad acceptance is still underway among stakeholders, ISO 15189 has the potential to shape the future of medical laboratory services for years to come. With its emphasis on risk-based thinking, patient-centered care, digital integration, and sustainability, ISO 15189:2022 is well-positioned to shape the future of medical laboratory services worldwide.
Ethical approval:
Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent:
Patient’s consent is not required as there are no patients in this study.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Medical laboratories — requirements for quality and competence. 2022. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/76677.html [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 04]
- [Google Scholar]
- International organization for standardization (ISO) 15189. Ann Lab Med. 2017;37:365-70.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ISO 15189 accreditation: Requirements for quality and competence of medical laboratories, experience of a laboratory II. Clin Biochem. 2009;42:279-83.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ISO 15189 accreditation: Requirements for quality and competence of medical laboratories, experience of a laboratory I. Clin Biochem. 2009;42:274-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Understanding and implementation of the important difference between ISO15189: 2012 and ISO15189: 2022: Medical laboratories requirements for quality and competence. Indian J Transplant. 2023;17:383-4.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Standards to support ISO 15189 implementation for medical laboratories accreditation. Clin Case Rep Int. 2022;6:1310.
- [Google Scholar]
- ISO 15189 accreditation: Navigation between quality management and patient safety. J Med Biochem. 2017;36:225-30.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL) Available from: https://nabl-india.org [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 04]
- [Google Scholar]
- International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) Facts & figures. Available from: https://ilac.org/about-ilac/facts-and-figures [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 04]
- [Google Scholar]
- Trends in the accreditation of medical laboratories by ISO 1518-9 In: Six Sigma and Quality Management. London: IntechOpen; 2023.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) Available from: https://ilac.org/about-ilac [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 04]
- [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization (WHO) Laboratory quality stepwise implementation tool. Available from: https://extranet.who.int/lqsi/content/quality-management [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 04]
- [Google Scholar]
- Challenges with the pursuit of ISO 15189 accreditation in a public health laboratory in Ghana. Afr J Lab Med. 2022;11:1448.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The next wave of innovation in laboratory automation: Systems for auto-verification, quality control and specimen quality assurance. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023;61:37-43.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Advantages and limitations of total laboratory automation: A personal overview. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57:802-11.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A practical tool for risk management in clinical laboratories. Cureus. 2022;14:e32774.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

