Translate this page into:
“MaRhyThe© and cupping” – A novel multimodal approach for radiation-induced trismus
*Corresponding author: Renu Pattanshetty, Department of Oncology Physiotherapy, KLE Institute of Physiotherapy, JN Medical College, Belgaum, Karnataka, India. renu_kori@rediffmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Pattanshetty R, Rao MS, Pawar NN. “MaRhyThe© and cupping” – A novel multimodal approach for radiation-induced trismus. Indian J Med Sci 2023;75:25-9.
Abstract
Head-and-neck cancer is the fifth most frequently occurring cancer in India. Among the various treatment options, side effects such as trismus are mostly caused due to radiation therapy. Physical therapy is known to be beneficial in treating post-cancer treatment side effects. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study report highlighting the efficacy of MaRhyThe© in treating radiation induced trismus. A multimodal approach (MaRhyThe©, Cupping therapy, Myofascial Release, and exercises) has shown to be beneficial in treating trismus, shoulder disability, pain, muscle spasm, and improving the quality of life in the head-and-neck cancer patient.
Keywords
Head-and-neck neoplasm
Physical therapy modalities
Cupping therapy
Quality of life
INTRODUCTION
Surgery, radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy are treatment of choices when it comes to treating head-and-neck cancers which may lead to increased secondary complications such as fibrosis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and muscles of mastication causing trismus which is defined as limited mouth opening <35 mm.[1]
Physiotherapeutic interventions such as myofascial release (MFR) of the fascial and neck muscles, active range of motion exercises of neck and shoulder, manual stretching, and jaw mobility exercises, have demonstrated to be effective in managing patients’ trismus and improving the quality of life.[2]
Matrix rhythm therapy works on the principle of cellular oscillations with a frequency as low as 8–12 Hz maintaining the physiological functioning of the body.[3] Cupping therapy is a soothing technique which increases subcutaneous blood circulation draining the fluid and toxins while improving the flexibility of the connective tissue.[4] This is the first case report highlighting the benefits of MaRhyThe© and non-abrasive cupping massage as a multimodal approach along with routine physiotherapy in treating radiation-induced trismus.
CASE REPORT
This is a case of a 48-year-old male with no prior medical and surgical history, family history, and no history of tobacco and alcohol consumption, presented with a non-proliferative and non-healing ulcer in his right buccal mucosa in oncology OPD. A frozen sample of the non-healing ulcer was examined for histopathological investigations in January 2021 that suggested absence of any malignancy. In March 2021, the patient had a reoccurrence of the ulcer. CT scan report revealed ill-defined heterogenicity with focal mucosal thickening involving the right buccal mucosa measuring 10.0 × 5.0 × 10.0 mm along with a single enlarged right level IB lymph node. The patient underwent surgery where wide local excision with the right lymph node dissection (level I–V) was performed, and a histopathological examination of the frozen section was examined. He was diagnosed with well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma with an advancing front showing moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa (Stage 3). A radiation therapy dose of 60 grays was administered in 30 fractions on daily basis. Patient developed radiation-induced trismus 2-week post-initiation of RT. However, no physiotherapy treatment was advised during RT due to skin changes and fragility of the skin. He was referred to the oncology physiotherapy OPD after 1-week post-RT completion. The initial physical evaluation revealed incisional mouth opening of 0.9 cm, [Figure 1a] pain and restricted shoulder and neck range of motion, scapular muscle weakness and Grade II tenderness over the right TMJ, right upper trapezius, rhomboids, pectorals, and sternocleidomastoid. On neurological examination, taste sensation was altered (sweet). Patient also presented mild skin changes over the irradiated area; however, the skin was not fragile. No other neurological deficits were observed. Physiotherapy rehabilitation was designed according to the needs of the patient and was explained to the patient on 1st day that included counseling. Due to the above-mentioned complaints, the patient underwent a 10-day multimodal tailor-made rehabilitation program [Table 1]. MaRhyThe© and non-abrasive cupping massage along with routine physical therapy was administered to the patient by certified practitioners. No adverse effects due to physical therapy were noted during and after treatment sessions [Table 1].
Variables | Pre-treatment | Post-treatment | 1-week follow-up | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visual analog scale (on activity) |
7/10 | 2/10 | 0/10 | |||
Tenderness on palpation | Grade II | Grade 0 | Grade 0 | |||
Intraoral examination | ||||||
Mucositis (WHO grades) | Grade I | Grade 0 | Grade 0 | |||
Sensations (Taste) | Sweet | Altered/Reduced | Normal | Normal | ||
Incisional mouth opening (in cm) | 0.9 | 2.8 | 4.2 | |||
Range of motion (in degrees) | Movements | Right | Left | Right | Left | - |
Shoulder | Flexion | 0–100 | 0–180 | 0–176 | 0–180 | - |
Scaption | 0–76 | 0–180 | 0–170 | 0–180 | - | |
Extension | 0–45 | 0–48 | 0–50 | 0–50 | - | |
Abduction | 0–110 | 0–178 | 0–176 | 0–180 | - | |
internal rotation | 0–80 | 0–90 | 0–90 | 0–90 | - | |
external rotation | 0–90 | 0–90 | 0–90 | 0–90 | - | |
Neck | Flexion | 0–70 | 0–80 | - | ||
Extension | 0–56 | 0–68 | - | |||
Lateral flexion | 0–42 | 0–30 | 0–45 | 0–40 | - | |
Rotation | 0–70 | 0–64 | 0–76 | 0–72 | - | |
Manual muscle testing (MRC grading) |
Shoulder flexors | 3+/5 | 3+/5 | 4+/5 | 4+/5 | - |
Shoulder extensors | 4−/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4+/5 | - | |
Shoulder abductors | 3−/5 | 4−/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | - | |
Shoulder adductors | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4+/5 | 4+/5 | - | |
Shoulder internal rotators | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4+/5 | 4+/5 | - | |
Shoulder external rotators | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4+/5 | 4+/5 | - | |
Neck flexors | 3/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | - | |
Neck extensors | 3/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | - | |
Neck lateral flexors | 3/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | - | |
Neck rotators | 3/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | - | |
SPADI (0–130) | 71 | 10 | - | |||
SPADI Pain (0–50) | 32 | 03 | - | |||
SPADI Disability (0–80) | 37 | 07 | - | |||
FACT-H and N (Total score: 0–148) | 60 | 124 | - | |||
Physical well-being (0–28) | 12 | 26 | - | |||
Social well-being (0–28) | 14 | 22 | - | |||
Emotional well-being (0–24) | 08 | 18 | - | |||
Functional well-being (0–28) | 10 | 26 | - | |||
Head-and-neck cancer subscale (0–40) | 16 | 32 | - | |||
10-DAY PHYSIOTHERAPY PROTOCOL | ||||||
Day | Intervention | Position | Frequency | |||
DAY 1–2 | a. SCM, upper trapezius, pectorals b. Breathing exercises: Apical exercise, diaphragmatic exercise, segmental exercise, thoracic expansion exercises. c. Active ROM exercises of neck and shoulder joint d. MFR: SCM, trapezius, pectorals, rhomboids, fascial muscles. e. TMJ mobilization. f. Mouth opening exercises (depression, elevation, retraction, protraction, and side to side) Tongue movements (protrusion, retrusion, and tongue curls). |
a. Stretching: in sitting position with arms resting on the arm rest and feet supported on the ground. b. Breathing exercises: Sitting c. Active ROM: sitting and standing unsupported d. MRF: sitting e. TMJ mobilization: supine lying f. Mouth opening exercises: sitting position with arms resting on the arm rest and feet supported on the ground. |
a. Stretching: 5 repetition × 30 s hold b. 5 repetitions × 3 sets c. 8 repetition × 2 sets d. 15–20 min e. 5 repetition × 2 sets f. 10 repetitions × 2 sets x 5 s hold g. 8–10 repetition × 2 sets; with ½ kg weight cuffs h. 10–12 repetition × 2 sets; with ½–1 kg weight cuffs i. 12 repetitions × 3 sets; with 1 kg weight cuff |
|||
DAY 3–5 | g. Same protocol as day 1–2 + Resisted exercise for the upper limb and upper back | |||||
DAY 6–7 | h. Same protocol as day 1–2 + resisted exercises for the upper limb and back | |||||
DAY 8–10 | Same protocol as day 1–2 + i. resisted exercises for the upper limb and back | |||||
DAY 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 | Matrix rhythm therapy was given every alternate day (five sessions).[5] | |||||
DAY 2, 4,6, 8, and 10 | Non-abrasive cupping massage was given every alternate day (five sessions) to trapezius (upper and middle), pectorals, and rhomboids.[7] | |||||
DAY 1–10 | Intraoral massage with honey | 20 circles × 2 sets |
MaRhyThe© is invariably a novel therapy and was 1st time administered to the cancer patient. While administering MaRhyThe©, patient was in a supine lying position and progressed to prone lying. Sterilized talcum powder was applied that to minimize the friction produced by the MaRhyThe© probe on the skin of cancer patient. It was given over the TMJ, SCM, trapezius, pectorals, rhomboids, paraspinal muscles, and the suboccipital region[4] [Figure 2]. Non-abrasive cupping massage was given for 5–10 min in supine lying for pectoralis muscle on the affected side and sitting with arms and feet rested for posterior neck muscles extending from the sub-occipital area covering the upper back including trapezius muscle[5] [Figure 3].
DISCUSSION
The present case reported the application of MaRhyThe© and non-abrasive cupping as novel multimodal and innovative therapies along with therapeutic exercises that are beneficial in improving incisional mouth opening, pain, tenderness, and range of motion of shoulder and neck as seen in shoulder pain and disability index scores, the strength of upper extremity, and quality of life as assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck questionnaire. Post-1 week of therapy, follow-up was done, and the patient showed further improvements in incisional mouth opening [Table 1 and Figures 4a and b].
Head-and-neck cancer and its related medical treatments are known to cause a range of adverse effects on the musculoskeletal system which impairs the flexibility of the muscle. This is said to decrease joint motion, physical, and functional ability of the individual to carry out their daily activities. Radiation therapy when subjected to the treatment area releases ionizing radiation causing free radicals to be released, causing an increase in oxidative stress. It also attributes significantly to collagen synthesis and inhibits collagen degradation resulting in connective tissue growth factor causing fibrosis.[1] These fibrotic changes cause further restricted movement. MaRhyThe© is known to improve the natural cellular oscillations causing an increase in local internal temperature at the treatment site causing an increase in the blood flow. Improved circulation helps in decreasing this oxidative stress and flushing of the metabolites. MaRhyThe© also influences muscle viscoelasticity and plasticity, improving the flexibility and endurance of the muscle. The improvement in muscle properties helps in reducing pain and improving the range of motion of the joint.[5] A similar study found MaRhyThe© to be efficient in improving 3–4 mm of incisional mouth opening.[6]
Cupping therapy works on the mechanism of negative suctioning that causes an increase in blood flow which relieves muscular tension. Thus, the use of non-abrasive cupping massage promotes muscle flexibility and joint range of motion.[4] 15-min cupping sessions have demonstrated beneficial in improving the shoulder range of motion when applied to the chest, upper-arm and back, and shoulder and neck regions.[7] Muscle spasms due to tissue injury caused by radiation therapy can be relieved through cupping therapy.
MFR attributes to changing the viscosity of the muscle. As the myofascial system stabilizes the musculoskeletal system, when altered due to various insults such as surgeries or radiation, it may result in pain and postural dysfunction. MFR has proved its efficacy in reducing neck pain and is widely used in a clinical setup with similar complications where five consecutive sessions of MFR have indicated that the discomfort and pressure pain levels in the trapezius and suboccipital regions have decreased.[8]
CONCLUSION
MaRhyThe© and cupping therapy were used as a multimodal approach along with routine physiotherapy in treating radiation-induced trismus and it has shown to be beneficial in treating trismus, shoulder disability, pain, muscle spasm, and improving the quality of life in head-and-neck cancer patient. Similar approaches may be recommended for further clinical trials in similar settings to further prove its effectiveness in this patient population.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
References
- Small molecule inhibitors of epithelial-mesenchymal transition for the treatment of cancer and fibrosis. Med Res Rev. 2020;40:54-78.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manual therapy for the management of pain and limited range of motion in subjects with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42:847-61.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effect of MaRhyThe versus myofascial mobility tool in female individuals with or without neck pain having forward head posture and buffalo hump-a randomized clinical trial. Indian J Phys Ther Res. 2020;2:113-20.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- The effects of cupping massage in patients with chronic neck pain-a randomised controlled trial. Complement Med Res. 2017;24:26-32.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effect of matrix rhythm therapy (MaRhyThe©) in trismus: A case series. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2020;8:193-6.
- [Google Scholar]
- Matrix rhythm therapy (MaRhyThe): A novel adjuvant treatment for OSMF-report of 3 cases with a brief review. J Dent Med Res. 2021;2:50-8.
- [Google Scholar]
- Management of frozen shoulder with oil cupping massage: A case study. Imam J Appl Sci. 2017;2:49-53.
- [Google Scholar]